For old nominations see: Fire Emblem Wiki:Votes for Featured Articles/Archive
Quick Guidelines to Voting
- For each vote under a nomination, be sure to put either For, if you second the nomination, or Against, if you oppose the nomination, at the beginning of your vote! The Total will be calculated as Votes For subtracted by Votes Against.
- Sign your votes with four tildes (~~~~). Using the signature button located on the top left of the edit space is the easiest way to do this.
Note: This page is permanently locked so that only Registered Users can edit here. If you do not have an account, just create one in Sign Up.
- You may only nominate/vote For a nomination once. However, you can choose to vote Against any nomination, as long as you give your reasoning.
- Use the bullet editing (*) to separate votes.
- Remember that featured articles are supposed to be chosen for how well written the article is, not how much you like the character/concept.
- An article cannot be featured more than once.
- The featured article will be set to be changed on the first of every month, though this may not always be possible for various reasons. If there is an equality of votes, than the admin in charge of the featured article will add a tiebreaker vote, and that article will be featured.
- For - I nominate Arvis for the next nomination for the Featured Article in this wiki, his page is incredibly looks good and his looks well written also, I think we should consider him to be featured in the 28th Set.-- King Marth 64 (talk • other wikis • blogs) 23:45, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
- For - I second that...--Aivass Remurias (talk) 07:39, April 14, 2013 (UTC)
- For - I also second that. -ProtoManOmega (talk) 00:24, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
- For- I forth this. Well written, organised and basically is really good. Why was this not suggested earlier? - There is a time for all things, and the end of a thing is better then the beginning. (talk) 11:59, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Against - I believe it could be more cleaner-use a slight spruce up. I don't believe it is over the top quality, but it certainly is good. But not to be featured, in my opinion. Bobosmith01 (talk) 15:39, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
- For - This is a great article and to be honest I'm suprised that it hasn't been featured already. Tiero (talk) 14:26, March 28, 2013 (UTC)
- For- it's highly informative and should go up. Cowcubrub (talk) 20:18, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
- For - Sacred Stones got me hooked to Fire Emblem. Yogurt Spill (talk) 23:58, June 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Against - The third reason is purely opinion. Not based on the guidelines.