Lance/Bow/Sword/Axe knights/paladins(on horseback) should be moved to a different articles as there very different from the amoured type of knights.there are no mage knights in those two games.– The preceding unsigned comment was added by Semajdraehs (talk • contribs).
Seperating?[]
Hey I have been wondering should we at some point seperate the differnt armor classes like bow armor etc? because though they are all armor based they are certainly not the same as a regular knight like for instance Baron is basically a general with a differnt pallete and more usable weapons and that has it`s own page. I think we should seperate them and maaybe have the sections for them link to the page for them because they are not the same as a regular armor knight as the normal ones use lances.Naglfar94 (talk) 03:19, August 22, 2012 (UTC)Naglfar94
- The "separate" classes are rather small. Why split them into stubbish articles? --Thenewguy34(Other) 10:38, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
I see well atleast axe armor would maybe have decent info I mean if you think about it the queen class page and baron are stub like oh well I was just wondering for the sake of keeping them organized and well placed as seeing them in knight is kinda odd when they are all differnt.Naglfar94 (talk) 20:57, August 24, 2012 (UTC)Naglfar94
Split Axe, Bow, and Sword Armor into their own page []
Any agreements, or opposals to Axe Armor, Bow Armor, and Sword Armor getting their own class pages? Emperor Hardin (talk) 13:49, September 25, 2016 (UTC)
- If I recall, the etc Generals have their own pages too, right? That should be precedent enough, right?--Otherarrow (talk) 14:15, September 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, there's pages for Axe General, and Sword General. Emperor Hardin (talk) 22:11, September 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Any final thoughts on making Armored Axe, Armored Sword, and Bow Armor separate? Emperor Hardin (talk) 01:28, September 26, 2016 (UTC)